{"id":18049,"date":"2020-10-28T08:00:07","date_gmt":"2020-10-28T12:00:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fondationrivieres.org\/?p=18049"},"modified":"2023-06-07T13:40:38","modified_gmt":"2023-06-07T17:40:38","slug":"deversements-deaux-usees-la-fondation-rivieres-devoile-le-triste-palmares-des-municipalites","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fondationrivieres.org\/en\/deversements-deaux-usees-la-fondation-rivieres-devoile-le-triste-palmares-des-municipalites\/","title":{"rendered":"Wastewater spills: Fondation Rivi\u00e8res reveals the sad record of municipalities"},"content":{"rendered":"

PRESS RELEASE
\n<\/strong>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE<\/p>\n

Montreal, October 28, 2020<\/strong> \u2013 Following the release on September 28 of its interactive map on wastewater spills, Fondation Rivi\u00e8res is now making public the list of 50 municipalities that stand out in terms of the number of spills in 2019.<\/p>\n

According to many experts, the interactive map<\/a> showed that 60,660 spills took place in 2019 across the province and saw their distribution by municipality. Based on the number of spills and the intensity index, Palmares<\/a> presented today now makes it possible to compare the performances of municipalities with each other. The ranking presents the list of 50 municipalities in four distinct portraits according to: 1) the number of spills<\/a>, 2) spill intensity index, 3) spill intensity index per capita and 4) ranking of the 10 largest cities.<\/p>\n

Why talk about outfall intensity?<\/strong><\/h2>\n

It is very difficult to measure the amount of wastewater that escapes into rivers in the event of a spill since this data does not exist. On the other hand, we know the size of each of the overflowing structures. We also know that the larger a structure, the higher the volume of wastewater released in the event of a spill. This is why Fondation Rivi\u00e8res developed the intensity index which takes into account the design flow of the treatment plant, the size of the structure where the spill takes place and the duration of each spill.<\/p>\n

Why divide the data by the number of residents?<\/strong><\/h2>\n

We can assume that a wastewater spill in Montreal, for example, is larger than a spill in a small municipality like La Pocati\u00e8re, simply because it is a larger city. How can cities be compared to each other? By normalizing the data by the number of inhabitants of each municipality. In doing so, we can more accurately compare municipalities with each other.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe idea behind this ranking is not to point the finger at certain cities, but above all to point out to governments the places where urgent action is needed. Currently no analysis of investment priorities is carried out. Money is injected randomly without territorial planning. However, if we wish to provide a solution to the problem, we must carry out the work according to the priority issues by watershed. This is the diagnosis that the map and the results allow us to make today. \u00bb \u2013 Andr\u00e9 B\u00e9langer, general director of Fondation Rivi\u00e8res.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

2019 ranking of the top 50 cities<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Municipalities marked with an asterisk group together several municipalities that are served by the same sanitation system. Visit the About section for any questions regarding the methodology used in the Map of wastewater spills in Quebec<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Top 50 municipalities by number of spills<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Prize list<\/strong><\/td>\nMunicipality<\/strong><\/td>\nNumber of spills<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1<\/td>\nQuebec *<\/td>\n3 180<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\nSaguenay<\/td>\n2 931<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\nShawinigan<\/td>\n2 135<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\nLaval<\/td>\n1 999<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\nMontreal<\/td>\n1 873<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\nTrois-Rivi\u00e8res<\/td>\n1 683<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\nSorel Tracy *<\/td>\n1 631<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
8<\/td>\nThetford Mines<\/td>\n1 552<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
9<\/td>\nSaint-Jean-sur-Richelieu *<\/td>\n1 462<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10<\/td>\nGatineau<\/td>\n1 459<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
11<\/td>\nLevi's<\/td>\n1 280<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
12<\/td>\nLongueuil *<\/td>\n1 191<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
13<\/td>\nSherbrooke *<\/td>\n1 142<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14<\/td>\nRouyn Noranda<\/td>\n1 142<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15<\/td>\nSaint Hyacinthe<\/td>\n1 025<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
16<\/td>\nBeauharnois<\/td>\n901<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
17<\/td>\nThe Hills *<\/td>\n886<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
18<\/td>\nSalaberry-de-Valleyfield<\/td>\n779<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19<\/td>\nChateauguay<\/td>\n768<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20<\/td>\nMont Laurier<\/td>\n754<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
21<\/td>\nDrummondville<\/td>\n742<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22<\/td>\nRimouski<\/td>\n728<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
23<\/td>\nChandler<\/td>\n709<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
24<\/td>\nAlma<\/td>\n635<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
25<\/td>\nBeloeil *<\/td>\n610<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
26<\/td>\nVictoriaville<\/td>\n609<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
27<\/td>\nMatane<\/td>\n606<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
28<\/td>\nTerrebonne *<\/td>\n592<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
29<\/td>\nMirabel<\/td>\n590<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
30<\/td>\nAmos<\/td>\n552<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
31<\/td>\nNotre-Dame-de-l\u2019\u00cele-Perrot<\/td>\n530<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
32<\/td>\nBrigham<\/td>\n513<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
33<\/td>\nCowansville *<\/td>\n509<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
34<\/td>\nDolbeau-Mistassini<\/td>\n449<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
35<\/td>\nThe Tuque<\/td>\n421<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
36<\/td>\nSt. Tite<\/td>\n416<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
37<\/td>\nThe fall<\/td>\n403<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
38<\/td>\nSaint-Eustache<\/td>\n391<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
39<\/td>\n*<\/td>\n386<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
40<\/td>\nGranby<\/td>\n372<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
41<\/td>\nSaint-F\u00e9licien<\/td>\n368<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
42<\/td>\nPorpoise<\/td>\n365<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
43<\/td>\nBedford*<\/td>\n354<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
44<\/td>\nSaint-J\u00e9r\u00f4me<\/td>\n348<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
45<\/td>\nWindsor *<\/td>\n341<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
46<\/td>\nPincourt *<\/td>\n339<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
47<\/td>\nGaspe<\/td>\n336<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
48<\/td>\nAlbanel<\/td>\n336<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
49<\/td>\nVal d'Or<\/td>\n326<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
50<\/td>\nEast Angus<\/td>\n313<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Top 50 municipalities by spill intensity index<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Prize list<\/strong><\/td>\nMunicipality<\/strong><\/td>\nIntensity<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1<\/td>\nLongueuil *<\/td>\n19 888 032<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\nLaval<\/td>\n5 771 017<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\nMontreal<\/td>\n4 945 739<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\nQuebec *<\/td>\n3 981 551<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\nTrois-Rivi\u00e8res<\/td>\n3 854 883<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\nSaint-Jean-sur-Richelieu *<\/td>\n2 717 817<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\nSaint Hyacinthe<\/td>\n2 483 146<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
8<\/td>\nSaguenay<\/td>\n2 165 736<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
9<\/td>\nGatineau<\/td>\n2 135 201<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10<\/td>\nLevi's<\/td>\n1 591 245<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
11<\/td>\nSalaberry-de-Valleyfield<\/td>\n1 446 016<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
12<\/td>\nShawinigan<\/td>\n1 370 699<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
13<\/td>\nMirabel<\/td>\n1 338 949<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14<\/td>\nThetford Mines<\/td>\n994 238<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15<\/td>\nSaint-J\u00e9r\u00f4me<\/td>\n926 305<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
16<\/td>\nSorel Tracy *<\/td>\n904 729<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
17<\/td>\nBlainville-Sainte-Th\u00e9r\u00e8se<\/td>\n872 855<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
18<\/td>\nSaint-Eustache<\/td>\n821 377<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19<\/td>\nAlma<\/td>\n748 030<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20<\/td>\nGranby<\/td>\n709 604<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
21<\/td>\nTerrebonne *<\/td>\n691 604<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22<\/td>\nRouyn Noranda<\/td>\n675 271<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
23<\/td>\nDrummondville<\/td>\n643 372<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
24<\/td>\nChateauguay<\/td>\n586 823<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
25<\/td>\nMatane<\/td>\n539 540<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
26<\/td>\nSaint-Bruno-de-Montarville *<\/td>\n492 220<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
27<\/td>\nLavaltrie<\/td>\n489 161<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
28<\/td>\nSaint Georges<\/td>\n472 567<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
29<\/td>\nVictoriaville<\/td>\n465 481<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
30<\/td>\nSainte Marie<\/td>\n449 193<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
31<\/td>\nVal d'Or<\/td>\n427 512<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
32<\/td>\nMercier<\/td>\n420 950<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
33<\/td>\nThe Prairie *<\/td>\n401 955<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
34<\/td>\nChandler<\/td>\n396 156<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
35<\/td>\nVarennes<\/td>\n391 442<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
36<\/td>\nRoberval<\/td>\n369 156<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
37<\/td>\nNicolet<\/td>\n367 449<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
38<\/td>\nJoliet *<\/td>\n332 888<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
39<\/td>\nSherbrooke *<\/td>\n299 219<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
40<\/td>\nMont Laurier<\/td>\n291 333<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
41<\/td>\nThe fall<\/td>\n270 505<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
42<\/td>\n*<\/td>\n261 733<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
43<\/td>\nBeauharnois<\/td>\n257 351<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
44<\/td>\nGaspe<\/td>\n255 293<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
45<\/td>\nBrigham<\/td>\n246 043<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
46<\/td>\nCowansville *<\/td>\n245 738<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
47<\/td>\nWaterloo<\/td>\n237 980<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
48<\/td>\nRimouski<\/td>\n227 692<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
49<\/td>\nMontebello<\/td>\n222 636<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
50<\/td>\nPort Cartier<\/td>\n222 035<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Top 50 municipalities by spill intensity index per capita<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Prize list<\/strong><\/td>\nMunicipality<\/strong><\/td>\nIntensity per capita<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1<\/td>\nMontebello<\/td>\n234,6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\nBrigham<\/td>\n106,1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\nAlbanel<\/td>\n85,3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\nPorpoise<\/td>\n79,7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\nBedford*<\/td>\n54,0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\nChandler<\/td>\n53,2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\nPasp\u00e9biac<\/td>\n52,8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
8<\/td>\nSt. Tite<\/td>\n51,5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
9<\/td>\nWaterloo<\/td>\n51,4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10<\/td>\nCaplan<\/td>\n49,6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
11<\/td>\nLongueuil *<\/td>\n49,2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
12<\/td>\nPlessisville<\/td>\n48,1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
13<\/td>\nSaint-Gabriel-de-Brandon<\/td>\n43,7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14<\/td>\nSaint Hyacinthe<\/td>\n43,7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15<\/td>\nNicolet<\/td>\n43,5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
16<\/td>\nSaint-Just-de-Breteni\u00e8res<\/td>\n43,1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
17<\/td>\nSt. Damase<\/td>\n38,9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
18<\/td>\nThetford Mines<\/td>\n38,7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19<\/td>\nMatane<\/td>\n38,2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20<\/td>\nRoberval<\/td>\n37,3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
21<\/td>\nLavaltrie<\/td>\n34,6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22<\/td>\nSainte-Anne-de-la-P\u00e9rade<\/td>\n34,0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
23<\/td>\nPort Cartier<\/td>\n33,8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
24<\/td>\nOur Lady of the North<\/td>\n33,5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
25<\/td>\nSainte Marie<\/td>\n33,0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
26<\/td>\nDisraeli<\/td>\n33,0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
27<\/td>\nSt. Vianney<\/td>\n32,7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
28<\/td>\nMegantic lake<\/td>\n32,4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
29<\/td>\nLes M\u00e9chins<\/td>\n31,5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
30<\/td>\nSaint-Luc-de-Vincennes<\/td>\n29,4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
31<\/td>\nMercier<\/td>\n29,4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
32<\/td>\nHoly Spirit<\/td>\n29,3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
33<\/td>\nSaint-Fran\u00e7ois-du-Lac<\/td>\n28,0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
34<\/td>\nTrois-Rivi\u00e8res<\/td>\n27,9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
35<\/td>\nSaint-Jean-sur-Richelieu *<\/td>\n27,7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
36<\/td>\nShawinigan<\/td>\n27,7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
37<\/td>\nM\u00e9tis-sur-Mer<\/td>\n27,5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
38<\/td>\nVerch\u00e8res<\/td>\n25,2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
39<\/td>\nSaint-Charles-de-Bellechasse<\/td>\n24,7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
40<\/td>\nAlma<\/td>\n24,3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
41<\/td>\nCrabtree<\/td>\n23,5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
42<\/td>\nMirabel<\/td>\n23,2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
43<\/td>\nSorel Tracy *<\/td>\n23,0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
44<\/td>\nSainte-Th\u00e8cle<\/td>\n22,3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
45<\/td>\nGoods<\/td>\n22,1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
46<\/td>\nSaint-\u00c9douard-de-Fabre<\/td>\n21,1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
47<\/td>\nMont Laurier<\/td>\n20,6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
48<\/td>\nThe fall<\/td>\n20,1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
49<\/td>\nBeauharnois<\/td>\n19,2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
50<\/td>\nSt. Chrysostom<\/td>\n19,2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
List of the 10 main cities according to the intensity index per capita<\/strong><\/h6>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Prize list<\/strong><\/td>\nMunicipality<\/strong><\/td>\nIntensity per capita<\/strong><\/td>\nPopulation<\/em><\/strong><\/td>\nIntensity<\/em><\/strong><\/td>\nNumber of spills<\/em><\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
1<\/td>\nLongueuil *<\/td>\n49,2<\/td>\n249 338<\/em><\/td>\n19 888 032<\/em><\/td>\n1 191<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\nTrois-Rivi\u00e8res<\/td>\n27,9<\/td>\n138 134<\/em><\/td>\n3 854 883<\/em><\/td>\n1 683<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\nSaguenay<\/td>\n14,8<\/td>\n146 606<\/em><\/td>\n2 165 736<\/em><\/td>\n2 931<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\nLaval<\/td>\n13,1<\/td>\n439 754<\/em><\/td>\n5 771 017<\/em><\/td>\n1 999<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\nLevi's<\/td>\n10,8<\/td>\n147 440<\/em><\/td>\n1 591 245<\/em><\/td>\n1 280<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\nGatineau<\/td>\n7,4<\/td>\n286 755<\/em><\/td>\n2 135 201<\/em><\/td>\n1 459<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\nQuebec *<\/td>\n7,0<\/td>\n564 030<\/em><\/td>\n3 981 551<\/em><\/td>\n3 180<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
8<\/td>\nTerrebonne *<\/td>\n5,9<\/td>\n117 664<\/em><\/td>\n691 604<\/em><\/td>\n592<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
9<\/td>\nMontreal<\/td>\n2,4<\/td>\n2 050 053<\/em><\/td>\n4 945 739<\/em><\/td>\n1 873<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10<\/td>\nSherbrooke *<\/td>\n1,8<\/td>\n169 136<\/em><\/td>\n299 219<\/em><\/td>\n1 142<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

List of municipalities served by the same sanitation network<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Municipality<\/strong><\/td>\nMunicipalities served by the same network<\/strong><\/td>\nPopulation<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bedford<\/td>\nStanbridge Station<\/td>\n275<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Beloeil<\/td>\nOtterburn Park<\/p>\n

McMasterville<\/p>\n

Mont-Saint-Hilaire<\/td>\n

8 280<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5 909<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19 022<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Chambly<\/td>\nRichelieu<\/td>\n5 479<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cowansville<\/td>\nEast Farnham<\/td>\n576<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Joliette<\/td>\nOur Lady of Lourdes<\/p>\n

Notre-Dame-des-Prairies<\/p>\n

Saint-Charles-Borrom\u00e9e<\/p>\n

St.Paul<\/td>\n

2 909<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
9 454<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14 575<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6 331<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The Meadow<\/td>\nDelson<\/p>\n

Candiac<\/p>\n

Saint Catherine<\/p>\n

St. Constant<\/td>\n

8 141<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22 306<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
17 463<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
29 273<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Longueuil<\/td>\nBoucherville<\/p>\n

Brossard<\/p>\n

St. Lambert<\/td>\n

42 714<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
89 092<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22 725<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The hillsides<\/td>\nCoteau-du-Lac<\/td>\n7 221<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Pincourt<\/td>\nTerrace-Vaudreuil<\/td>\n1 965<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Quebec<\/td>\nSaint-Augustin-de-Desmaures<\/td>\n19 477<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Saint-Bruno-de-Montarville<\/td>\nSaint-Basile-le-Grand<\/td>\n17 323<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu<\/td>\nSainte-Anne-de-Sabrevois<\/td>\n2 138<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Sherbrooke<\/td>\nHatley<\/td>\n2 188<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Sorel Tracy<\/td>\nSaint-Joseph-de-Sorel<\/p>\n

Sainte-Anne-de-Sorel<\/td>\n

1 608<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2 776<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Terrebonne<\/td>\nMascouche<\/p>\n

Bois-des-Filion<\/td>\n

49 466<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
9 970<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Windsor<\/td>\nVal Joli<\/td>\n1 654<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Download the list<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

- 30 -<\/p>\n

For informations :<\/strong><\/p>\n

Genevi\u00e8ve Tardy
\nCommunications Manager
\n514 424-3556
\ncommunications@fondationrivieres.org<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Press release - Following the September 28 release of its interactive map on wastewater spills, Fondation Rivi\u00e8res is now making public the list of the 50 municipalities that stand out in terms of the number of spills in 2019.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":14174,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_members_access_role":[],"_members_access_error":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[37,40,48,71,80],"class_list":["post-18049","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-communiques","tag-deversements","tag-eaux-usees","tag-environnement","tag-municipalites","tag-preservation"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fondationrivieres.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18049","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fondationrivieres.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fondationrivieres.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fondationrivieres.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fondationrivieres.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18049"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/fondationrivieres.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18049\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fondationrivieres.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/14174"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fondationrivieres.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18049"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fondationrivieres.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18049"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fondationrivieres.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18049"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}